Nice post Lisa. It's a good basis for what we should all be doing in PR or social media or for our blogs.
It was always odd to me to read about memes (current and past) and no one did the digging, no one took the initiative (especially with PR bloggers) to call and get the full story but to just dogpile and knee jerk attack.
The way I write (crap, when I write) my blog is to ask "how would I feel if I was the PR person on the other end?" It changes my writing to give a full, balanced view (or at least a more balanced view). I could have dogpiled onto Klout, but I interviewed first and took their points and addressed issues. Look at FedEx Furniture, Kryptonite, Dell Hell - all these are memes with just one side of the story, because few cared enough to get both sides because it wasn't good for the story. When I spoke to FedEx, it was shocking that I was the only person (blogger or journalist) to call to get their side of the story; that's pathetic.
So in any part of PR, you ask questions. You ask clients questions, you ask bosses questions, you get clarification to do your job well. When you write a blog post, you ask questions to your readers and to yourself to get the best story.
And as my old boss said about FAQs - any idiot can ask questions; it's about asking questions and coming up with answers that sets you apart.
@jspepper Jeremy, I've been thinking about this very topic since you and I discussed it on @shonali blog. I disagree with you, to a certain extent. Blogging is not journalism so, while we should explore all angles and be responsible, it's really about our opinions and putting out different voices on topics. I always take a stance on one side of a subject (even if I really am in the middle) because that's what generates conversation and what opens all of our minds to different thinking. If we always provide a fair and balanced assessment, it's not blogging - it's reporting. I've been thinking a lot about what happened with Chrysler and their social media agency this week. I'm going to blog about it next week. I'm taking the stance of an agency owner and what I would do if a client told me I had to fire an employee. Am I going to call Chrysler or NMS? No. I'm not going to do that because the blog post isn't about them. It's about me and my experience. I've asked a lot of questions around this topic, with people I admire, in order to build my stance. But it's my blog, my experience.
Perhaps the difference is that you have access to some of the people (like Klout) who will take your calls/emails and quickly get back to you. As I build the Spin Sucks brand, I hope to have that same access, but right now I'm more concerned with providing one person's opinion in order to further a conversation and open, not only the minds of our readers, but mine, too.
@ginidietrich Disagree Gini - especially with the blogging isn't journalism tact, as that doesn't hold water. When it's convenient for bloggers, they're journalists. When they get called out for not conforming to certain journalistic standards, they're bloggers.
And being a journalist or reporter does not mean you cannot have an opinion - I present both sides, and then give my opinion. I don't do it for every post, but I'd rather write from a position of knowledge than just shoot from the hip. I'm about to write about Brogan's Blog Topics, but before I condemn the idea, I signed up and paid for it for a month so I could experience it; and yes, I spoke with him as well.
But, since we brought up that other post - not knowing that linking a name to an article would be an SEO move is an SEO 100 level thing. As an SM/PR person, and since it's a topic on your blog, I would think you would be more aware of it.
And thanks - these companies respond to me not because I've blogged for 8-9 years but because I ask to speak to them about their services, or to get their side of the story. Everyone wants to tell their story, pitch their service.
@wabbitoid @ginidietrich @jspepper Definitely. Although like any industry, there are quite a few crap journalists as well that don't care about integrity - bad eggs are everywhere, codes of standard and ethics or not. ;-)
@ginidietrich @jspepper While I don't think that bloggers are journalists, I think there is a lot to learn from the standards of journalism that make more effective blogging. That does not mean we can expect the standards of objectivity to apply for amateurs, however.
This comes up a lot when talking about Citizen Journalism. Can we expect someone who does not have the time and resources of an editor to match journalistic standards? I think that any blogger, citizen journalist or no, would do a lot better working as a "blank slate" rather than trying to force objectivity onto the situation.
What I mean by this is being as honest as possible in reporting "This is what I see in front of me". A (succinct!) description of where the observer is standing professionally / etc and a good shot of humility goes a long way.
Objectivity is a very artificial construct - one that assumes the most relevant perspectives are known, can be reliably interviewed, and then synthesized. I think that reporters rarely live up to this ideal, so I don't see why it would be considered a good approach for amateurs.
I wrote about this in more depth in my internet writing guide, put together for a group of citizen journalists some time ago. I would appreciate your comments, of course
@jspepper @ginidietrich Techcrunch. Mashable. Huffington Post. Read Write Web. All their writers have to work to an editorial process, and have a team of people above them to approve, critique and advise on getting opinions and viewpoints. They're also paid and have to adhere to a journalistic code.
Despite how you try and spin it, Jeremy, bloggers are not journalists. Bloggers are writers, yes, as are journalists, but to put them in the same boat as journalists? That's as tired as the argument that not calling for a viewpoint is poor. Kudos to you for following up on companies; but just as much kudos to others for sharing their thoughts and how they would have dealt with it as well, without having to wait on someone from a company deeming whether they're worthy of their time or not.
@jspepper Yep - and I'm learning it. Which is why I agreed with you that you were right - I should have linked to the TechCrunch article on their name and Tim's LI profile on his. I made a mistake. I've learned from it.
@ginidietrich I'm not claiming any expertise in SEO - never have, never will - but just understanding the basics of it. I think that's every PR/SM person's responsibility nowadays.
Yes, we'll agree to disagree.
@jspepper I suppose we'll agree to disagree then. That's the beauty of blogging and the web. And yes, SEO is a topic on our blog, but not something I write about (unless I'm talking about something I learned at a conference). I run an agency - it's impossible for me to be an expert in everything...as much as I would really love it.
Twitter
Facebook
RSS
Pinterest
Google+
LinkedIn








[...] E não será a curiosidade (e a capacidade de questionar) uma das ferramentas preciosas para quem trabalha em comunicação? Para os curiosos, um breve apontamento pode ser lido aqui. [...]
[...] Curiosity: An Essential In Every PRs Toolkit – Spin Sucks [...]
[...] the opportunity to guest post over on Spin Sucks recently (big thanks to Gini Dietrich). My post, Curiosity: An Essential in Every PR Pros Tool Kit, focused on seeking your passion by fiercely pursuing the answers to all of our questions so that [...]