<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Four Benefits of Charitable Content Strategies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spinsucks.com/marketing/four-benefits-of-charitable-content-strategies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spinsucks.com/marketing/four-benefits-of-charitable-content-strategies/</link>
	<description>Professional Development for PR and Marketing Pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 07:42:15 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: adriasaracino</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/marketing/four-benefits-of-charitable-content-strategies/#comment-100225</link>
		<dc:creator>adriasaracino</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2012 21:11:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=11382#comment-100225</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for your comment. I don&#039;t believe I explained this well, apologies for that. By easy to execute, I meant having a clear process and doesn&#039;t need much coordination with a lot of different internal teams to create. Some ideas would need to get PR, branding, marketing, search marketing, etc. involved, whereas infographics can generally be created with content, research, design, and promotional team - so a lot less sign off is required. While they are challenging to create in terms of time, I was thinking from an agency perspective in that they can usually be pitched and executed with very little sig noff. I hope this makes sense and I thank you for your taking the time to point out my glide over.  @joe_keenan ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comment. I don&#8217;t believe I explained this well, apologies for that. By easy to execute, I meant having a clear process and doesn&#8217;t need much coordination with a lot of different internal teams to create. Some ideas would need to get PR, branding, marketing, search marketing, etc. involved, whereas infographics can generally be created with content, research, design, and promotional team &#8211; so a lot less sign off is required. While they are challenging to create in terms of time, I was thinking from an agency perspective in that they can usually be pitched and executed with very little sig noff. I hope this makes sense and I thank you for your taking the time to point out my glide over.  @joe_keenan </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe_keenan</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/marketing/four-benefits-of-charitable-content-strategies/#comment-100044</link>
		<dc:creator>joe_keenan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Apr 2012 21:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=11382#comment-100044</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi,  great post -- very helpful.   However, I would disagree that infographics are easy to execute.  I&#039;d say &quot;accurate, effective, great infographics are very challenging to create.&quot;   Cheers.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi,  great post &#8212; very helpful.   However, I would disagree that infographics are easy to execute.  I&#8217;d say &#8220;accurate, effective, great infographics are very challenging to create.&#8221;   Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
