The interesting thing about discussions like this is that you are, to a large degree, preaching to the choir. One would assume that most of the people who read and respond are active users of social media and are trying to decide the degree to which they want to participate (platforms, time, etc.). One wonders whether there's another way to engage the ones who aren't engaged. I think our passion intimidates this group; you can see it in their eyes at Chamber and SCORE meetings. They'd like to play -- maybe -- but they don't fully understand the cost of admission.
Blogging is great; so is Facebook, YouTube, LinkedIn, and scores of other platforms, we hear speaker after speaker at PodCamps tell us. Lots of nodding and "hallelujahs." But what would you expect the reaction to be there? We run the risk of being accused of arrogance for calling static websites "so 1990s" (with no disrespect intended toward Anna). Some of the most successful people I know have static websites (or no websites at all) and to move in a more "current" direction might just be a distraction.
Perhaps our best approach would be to go to where the 1990's crowd is and show them how easy it is to dip their toes in the water and realize that like any long-term relationship, it may take a while for them to go cliff-diving.
Gini makes the point well. She wasn't comfortable with video but she's getting there over time. I think the real future growth is with the people we can take by the hand and grow our business with them -- with baby steps. Too many people are trying to build outposts before they make sure the home base is safe and secure.
@@peter_osborne That Peter, is totally brilliant! You are so right (preaching to the choir) and I love the dip their toes in. We have all seen the glazed over faces when we do share the passion and I know I do it all the time. The polite nodding of the head versus talking to someone who gets it and comes close to jumping up and down in excitement. Great comment, Peter and very insightful!
@@peter_osborne That's what I do for a living! Self-proclaimed SM "experts" do not like usually like my work site 'cuz I do my best to translate all this stuff into something that makes sense to potential clients:
http://MediaHare.com
I see little point in preaching to the choir, m'sefl! :-)
Twitter
Facebook
RSS
Pinterest
Google+
LinkedIn











[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Gini Dietrich and Janet Fogarty, David Crouch. David Crouch said: great points – RT @ginidietrich: The Future of Websites via @SpinSucks http://ff.im/-tz9M1 [...]
[...] even have a static website any more (See our friend Gini Dietrich’s post on this at her blog Spin Sucks). No, you need to have a social media page where you actively connect with, converse with, and [...]
[...] The Future of Websites by Gini Dietrich [...]