Badges? We Don’t Need No Stinkin’ Badges
Today’s guest post is written by Joey Strawn.
What if I told you that you were approaching gamification all wrong?
More than likely I’d be greeted with one of two answers:
1. What’s gamification?
2. Nuh-uh, we have badges and stuff!
For those unfamiliar with the term, Lisa Gerber wrote a great post called “Game Mechanics and Its Effect on Marketing” that you should definitely read (or re-read).
I could spend days citing stats about the explosion of gaming:
- Stats such as Nielsen research that shows games are the second most frequent internet activity for Americans after social networks (more popular than email or porn).
- Gartner postulates that by 2015, more than 50 percent of organizations that manage innovation processes will gamify those processes and that by 2014, 70 percent of the Global 2000 organizations will have at least one gamified application.
- Research done by M2 Research says that the market for gamification will grow to $1.6 billion by 2015.
I could go on, but I won’t. By now you’ve probably already heard about gamification. If you haven’t tried it already, hopefully you’re at least thinking about thinking about it.
First, stop.
Let’s start from the beginning.
Gamification B.C.
Gamification is not new. When chaos ruled the land, humans naturally banded together to prosper in communities. Commerce and business became established within these communities and those that prospered created and introduced the concept of competition, or gaming. Just ask the Babylonians, Romans, Chinese, and Americans if you don’t believe me.
Fast forward to modern times. When Al Gore first invented the Internet, there was chaos. Individuals littered the web waves hacking, coding, creating, and revolutionizing the Internet before any of us had any idea what was going on. Next came widespread public adoption and again, chaos ensued. Eventually, we naturally started banding together around social networks and from there, social commerce began to emerge. Next, just as in the Middle Ages, groups began introducing gaming to prosper, and to win.
So let’s stop approaching this whole idea like it’s new. The reason people suck at online marketing and public relations is not because they don’t know how to do it. It’s because when the barrier of entry is so low, they go crazy and start throwing out any thoughtless crap they can think of.
Implementing gaming concepts like a blind mute in a NASCAR is not going to accomplish anything. Adding badges to your website does not make you any more of a gamified business than adding a picture of a giraffe makes you a zoo.
Gamification at it’s heart is about understanding what motivates people in positive ways towards predictable behaviors. When game mechanics are tacked on at the end of a marketing campaign just to say that you are “gamified,” you’re doing it wrong.
Like any new endeavor, gamification should be researched, tested, and integrated into your strategy. Most importantly, it needs to be overseen by an expert; someone who understands the process and the base mechanics. Points and badges are a good start, but they are just a start. It’s where we go from here that really matters.
Game on.
(+10 “Reading” Awarded To You)
Joey Strawn is a blogger, husband, and animal lover. He is President of Empty Jar Marketing and has been called “smart,” “engaging,” and “adorable” by people you know and trust.









Suddenly my blog looks naked, no points and badges. Guess I need to find a 'how to pimp your blog like a pro in 5 automated steps' post or something. Motivation, why people do something... thank you! When it comes to consumers it's about them, what they want, need, crave right now and why they 'play' along and who cares about the scores anyway. Guess I'm the wrong audience for this (still thought it funny - and true), as I'm not a gamer. FWIW.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI love how Marketers and Brands think we want to behave in ways we really don't in real life. We love games. But we don't really love Brand or Advertising based games. And we need value. If there is no chance at a reward we don't want to play. And they forget we have busy lives. For the 99% of us that are normal we will choose probably a gazillion things we would rater do. If the bribe is enough maybe we will play. But we do not want to play games with most brands...maybe not even some brands...maybe only a few brands.
So yes it is being looked at wrong. No one is checking in using FourSquare, Gowalla, or Places. 0.0001% of Total visitors checking in is really zero. Next time you go out see how many check ins in total 99% of the places you go have and you will realize it's zero.
No one asked us if we want to play. In fact we don't. We want to play real games...unless the bribe is good. And then it really is just a bribe right?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHowieSPM I know this is a little bit of a rant -- but I just never got the point FourSquare, places, etc... I frequently get Twitter followers (undoubtedly expecting a follow-back) who are simply posting the nodes along their FourSquare journey through life -- "I'm mayor of Starbucks", "Just checked in a Panera", etc. etc.
I know I should treat this like Lewis and Clark discovering the Mississippi, or the chronology of great Civil War battles, but... somehow it just doesn't do it for me. I mean... not even my Wife is very interested that I just went to Ace Hardware to get some ant poison.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeglenn_ferrell HowieSPM I'm going to have to agree with you here. The only reason I hang out on foursquare is to beat . Unless I can win something and it is an attainable win, I'm not really interested. So it does have to be approached from a more individualized perspective. We're like dogs. we'll do what you want us to do for even small rewards.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLisa Gerber HowieSPM Hmmm ... dogs. M'be Foursquare, etc. is all about the "Territorial Imperative". M'be it's fundamentally about peeing on trees. M'be all of marketing is about tapping into the mammalian and reptilian parts of our brains and... M'be I need to get back to work :)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLove this post, agree that gamification is a powerful tool but the explosion of 'achievements' in gaming has made a lot of them lose their appeal. An achievement is completing a typically violent level without killing anyone, not killing 10,000 people. That's not an achievement, that's just you spending a lot of time in the game.
I think stats have a huge role to play in this sector also: I've said before that I love my kindle to bits, but I really think I would read a lot more if there was some way of measuring my performance, number of words read, pages turned, graphed on per day, per week, per month, playing against myself to self-improvement. And it'd sell more books!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMattieTK That is such a great idea!!! why don't they do that? they could even tie it into school curricula. kids that read more get certain rewards...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLisa Gerber tell me about it, remind me to write a blog post on all these crazy web 2.0 ideas I have some time ^^
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMattieTK Lisa Gerber I love that idea as well. I think Jesse Schell brought up an idea like that in one of his talks saying that not only could they give you points for reading, but give you different amounts of points for reading "quality" books. It would really be an interesting endeavor, especially in the education realms.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMattieTK Sounds kinda like a "book worm." Anyone else remember those? Great idea.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeMattieTK I agree with Lisa -- great idea ! I'm wondering how this gets moving -- maybe Amazon championing some education program, running a pilot with this functionality at some school, etc. Good thought, Mattie.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI loved that post. I'm now motivated to test out your 'Giraffe NOT = Zoo' hypothesis. I'm secretly hoping it does make my blog a zoo. Anyone have a good giraffe photo?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeExtremelyAvg I am dying. laughing right now. awesome.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeExtremelyAvg Lisa Gerber if you follow africam on the Twitter they have wildlife alerts where Giraffes show up. http://www.africam.com/wildlife/index.php
I have seen elephants, giraffes, heyenas, wild boar, they even have a black eagles nest by a water fall. And we think we have no privacy these poor animals in the wild naked being caught on Webcam!
And who says the dumb alien doesn't bring zoology to Spin Sucks?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHowieSPM ExtremelyAvg Lisa Gerber africam Now.. back to Foursquare... if someone posted, "Just became mayor of Starbucks and, guess what, there was this Giraffe..." Now that might get my attention. Note to Starbucks -- Petting Zoos.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeExtremelyAvg I can find you some giraffe photos and we'll see how it works together. ; )
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likedeleted_91832_Sean McGinnis lisagerber :) glad to see you're paying attention. And absolutely; everything we do ties back into a good strategy. and audience segmentation. (that's actually my own personal inside joke, I don't think I've shared with anyone. in one of the blogworld sessions I attended, the answer to every single question was audience segmentation. I could have gotten very drunk if i had to drink every time those two words were stated).
Oh and, it depends. right? :)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLisa Gerber deleted_91832_Sean McGinnis That reminds me of a conference I attended years ago where some colleagues and I talked about whether people would notice if we gave the same presentation at every session, as long as we closed with 'Coffee is for closers."
Damn, Glen Garry Glen Ross for that line.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likedeleted_91832_Sean McGinnis Lisa Gerber lisagerber The answer of "it depends on your strategy" in marketing reminds me a lot of growing up in the church and using the answer "because God loves us" for everything. It can be a catch-all or a crutch, depending on how you use it and your motivations, so once again, it all depends on your strategy. : )
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likedeleted_91832_Sean McGinnis ps - i didn't take it as an accusation. When i said "we", I meant the Royal We - all marketers. :)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeConversation from Twitter
The history of gamification and reasons you need it in your marketing program: http://t.co/zGKYBZk by joey_strawn RT ginidietrich
dannybrown love your new display pic
Great post! RT @ginidietrich: Badges? We don't need no stinking badges by joey_strawn http://bit.ly/qEQQN7
ginidietrich Maybe he meant- - - - bridges+)
kmtirpitz No bridges could be a problem
ginidietrich How are u? I'm silly and hungrey
kmtirpitz I'm silly and hungry, too!