Arment Dietrich

Can a Tweet be More Effective than a Super Bowl Ad?

By: Arment Dietrich | November 4, 2010 | 
5

Ford on TwitterFord Motor Company believes social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter can gain them greater word-of-mouth opportunities within their target audiences for less money than Super Bowl ads.

“Customers are spending as much time with the mobile smart phone or online as they are watching TV now, so our advertising dollars have to flow to where the people are,” says Jim Farley, Ford’s marketing chief.

But why are companies just realizing this now? That is true, but when you make new friends, you don’t forget the old.

Has last year’s announcement that PepsiCo Inc. would no longer pay for Super Bowls ads trickled down because of budget constraints or have they created a new case study for their advertising efforts (or lack thereof)?

The Super Bowl is still one of the most watched television programs and according to Nielsen, “over half of the audience that tunes into the Super Bowl enjoys the commercials more than the actual game.”

I believe in social media but I also believe in those commercials. To me the good ones get media exposure for a long time. During the weeks following the Super Bowl, I see the replayed commercials everywhere. They either take up my Facebook wall or someone tells me to watch them on YouTube.

Will the Super Bowl be as fun this year without our beloved launching of great commercials?

0 Shares
Tweet
Share
Share
+1
Pin
Email
[postmatic_subscribe_widget]
[postmatic_subscribe_widget]