Facebook Is Becoming Walmart
One of the things I love about Europe (ok, France in particular) is the food shopping. They still go to the marché in Europe, an open street market, and buy meat from the boucherie, bread at the boulangerie, and cheese from the fromagerie.
It’s worth it to go out of your way and make your purchases from people who are passionate about what they are doing. The experience is richer, and the quality of purchases far superior to the Supermarché, an American throwback to the big box grocery store; a homogenous, concrete box with fluorescent lights, packaged goods and processed foods.
Which is why, when Facebook announced Places, I rolled my eyes. Facebook comments plugin was introduced a few weeks ago and now Facebook Deals is here. Facebook is becoming the Walmart of social media and it’s eroding the experience. I even wonder if it will become its downfall.
What will happen when Facebook continues to try and be everything to everyone?
It will become a lifeless concrete box, losing its sense of community and identity. Facebook will be mediocre at a lot of things rather than outstanding at one. It will push away its very demographic that was attracted to the pop culture it represented and become an object of derision for its sheer mega-presence.
I love Facebook. But I prefer my social media in silos, don’t you? I have different networks on different social sites, with different goals at each one. I love it because it’s a very efficient way for me to stay in touch with family, friends and colleagues all over the world, with whom I would normally not take the time to communicate on an individual basis.
I am not there so I can see when my friend in London checked into her corner convenient store (If I did, I’d friend her on Foursquare), or when my colleague who is a fishing fanatic got a deal on a guided fishing trip, or to know when my aunt who is into quilting commented on her favorite quilting blog.
As a result, I’ve become particular whom I will friend and what I will “like” on Facebook. I spend time every week cleaning up that list, and ridding my newsfeed of unwanted content. The thing is, I’m savvy to doing that, but I see a significant percentage of my Facebook friends who are completely inactive, having lost interest and I suspect this is one of the reasons.
I’m mourning the loss of the long tail in social media. From an organizational standpoint, I can see that businesses might welcome a consolidation of outlets, but I fear it dilutes the engagement.
What do you think of silos in social networking? Are you a silo- or a one-stop shopper?









RT @thomaspower: Facebook becoming Walmart http://www.spinsucks.com/social-media/facebook-is-becoming-walmart/ #ecademy http://ff.im/-zyyhr
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeFacebook becoming Walmart http://www.spinsucks.com/social-media/facebook-is-becoming-walmart/ #ecademy http://ff.im/-zyyhr
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeYeah, you'd think major corporations would have learned from Wal-Mart's example. That whole lifeless concrete box thing went so badly for Wal-Mart. They should have known that trying to be all things to all people would cause a backlash that would send their customers off to small independent retailers.
Oh, wait, what to do you mean Wal-Mart is still the largest retailer in the US? I never shop there so I assumed they'd just gone out of business. I guess this means that there'll still be several billion people on Facebook after the cool kids abandon it for the next big thing.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAnd now we have Facebook questions. So far, it's been fun to play with on a Friday afternoon, but it's already clogging my stream. I don't know how I feel about it yet, but it certainly takes Quora head on.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likeum i thought that was part of the plan. when you want to connect to the internet you won't open a browser, but open your standalone facebook application and thus would be your connection to "everything". questions, groups, deals, places, email@facebook.com, etc, etc... facebook wants to be to the internet, what Windows is to PCs. frankly, i'm not having any of it. makes me think this guy really thinks he knows what he's doing by taming the beast of the internet... but the citizens will revolt eventually...
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeIt is funny and interesting how social media people and business leaders just assume every tool should be co-opted for business purposes. Facebook sucks for business, I think. People are too busy sharing photos, flirting with old friends, or connecting with family. The tools aren't that great either. One exception seems to be event-based communication, including deals, specials, concerts, etc. But "liking" the JCPenney page? No thanks. OK, argue with me!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likerustyspeidel OK, I'll argue with you. There are SOME businesses that do well on facebook. Business in an interesting line of work - something we want to learn more about behind the scenes, like, oh, a winery, your favorite ski resort. But there has to be an emotional attachment, or certain level of education involved.
I also think it can work on a hyper-local level. If you're restaurant and you just got a box of, I don't know - fresh strawberries and the dessert chef is making something AMAZING with it, you might just get me to come in tonight if you post a photo.
other than that? I agree with you. JC Penney? no way. the only way for that to work is to give stuff away. and that doesn't work (from the business side)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAhh but you're not the target Facebook user, Gini. You use Facebook to connect with the world, not limited to your family and close friends. You don't have less than 300 mutual friends. You have a page, too, which is not the target user either -- for a user needs a profile to have a page.
The evolution of Facebook since I joined the site in 2005 is sensical. The typical Facebook user is not a Twitter user nor has a blog. Those that do are using FB differently, and that's why opinions like yours are appealing and are why your comment field here is full of people on your bandwagon. They aren't the target FB user either.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAri Herzog Hi! actually I wrote this post, so I'll respond. Really? I'm not the target user? the way they are behaving, I thought EVERYONE was their target user. Interesting perspective, however.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLisa Gerber Ari HerzogI'm with you, Lisa. Facebook's user/customer "sweet spot" is a Rorschach blot, where the interpretation is a projection of the observers attitudes, expectations and mental state -- and maybe that's by design.
As with most things in life, The Simpsons summarize the situation best. In Season 9, Episode 9 ("Reality Bites"), Marge takes a job as an agent with Red Blazer Realty. When boss Lionel Hutz expresses concern that Marge's "no pressure" approach is popular with customers but is not selling homes, Marge cites the agency's slogan, "The Right House for the Right Person."
Hutz's response: "Listen, it's time I let you in on a little secret, Marge. The right house is the house that's for sale; the right person is anyone."
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDominating a niche takes incredible focus and restraint which is why many people struggle at it.
Facebook doesn't have to be the best at anything to survive because they have millions upon millions upon millions of people using the service. If they do a bunch of things okay they will still maintain their current position.
It doesn't matter if they keep adding on because aside from us who can step out of the user shoes and think about the problem from 30,000 feet, the typical user will continue to use the platform as is.
It's like a LEGO. You take it out of the package, put it together and it works just fine. But LEGOS get way more fun when you make the thing on the outside of the package without the directions and by slapping on other pieces from other sets. But, if you have never done that before, just follow the directions and you get a simple to use final product.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeYou just had to go and mention France, didn't you. Now I'm procrastinating by checking out airfares.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeFollowtheLawyer What's that? procrastination? we have just the cure for that: http://www.spinsucks.com/entrepreneur/ive-been-putting-off-writing-this-post-on-procrastination/
LOL! I'm with you, I daydream of France all the time. any chance I can write it about it I will. This is why I'm jealous of johnfalchetto
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLisa, you're spot on. I feel like it's eroding the web. It's like it's just trying to annex everything out there. What next? Facebooks (an Amazon competitor) ? FaceDocs ?
Me no like.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like"It will become a lifeless concrete box, losing its sense of community and identity."
In my opinion, it has already reached the point in numerous ways.
I went to a private Christian University that blocked MySpace 3 days into my freshman year (2005) because there was a bunch of questionable material that some kids were accessing. I know, I know, pretty crazy. But it was like kicking me in the face. I didn't do e-mail or instant message, I "Myspaced". My entire social network was gone.
But then Facebook came along. It was incredible. It was exclusive, it was simple, and wasn't slow and profile pages weren't annoyingly "busy" with glitter images and 40 YouTube videos. Also, no music played when I landed on a profile page. It was the perfect balance of simplicity and powerful functionality.
Not anymore, unfortunately. And honestly, it makes me kind of sad because as shallow as this may sound, Facebook was an "icon" of my college career. Now, I just don't like it for the exact reasons you laid out!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeWhen facebook changed their format to separate the update streams to show me the ones I interact with on one list and the ones I don't on another list, it messed up my flow. Just because I'm not commenting doesn't mean I 'm not interested. That change resulted in me spending less time on the site - a lot less. I still love facebook, but maybe they should stop tinkering and leave well enough alone.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likethatgirlisfunnythey do tinker a lot, yes they do.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHey Lisa! Great post. I'm definitely in the camp of keeping things separate. To me the social tools should augment a brand or products online identity by allowing navigation between all platforms...Facebook, Twitter, brand.com website, blog (if applicable), etc. Each platform has a purpose and trying to bring them all together doesn't make sense to me.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeFacebook always reminds me of that lovely old saying about not putting all your eggs in one basket! They want to be everything to everyone and some folks are ok with them being everything and controlling everything. I think if it more like all of life's little indulgences....everything is good in moderation!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeFacebook feels like it's becoming too commercial. It's not just about updating your status, it's about status, period. From making sure everyone knows what restaurants we frequent when we check-in to the Escape package just purchased on Living Social. What we share and what we like is becoming more company and product based than ever. Furthermore, it seems that people are updating their statuses less with their own words and relying on check-ins and likes and sharing to imply what they're doing. This takes away the personal element in using our own words to communicate, making Facebook the ultimate targeted mass-marketing vehicle. Facebookers are the ultimate salesman.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAnne Ryan oh yes! I referred to this the other day as FB in its pure form - I just like the personal updates and the photos. I go to the other sites for the other stuff! and i'll watch network TV if I want a ton of ads!!! :)
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeAlthough these small merchants are more expensive than larger supermarket chains for food, we still go there for our bread and cakes. Why?
It goes back to the discussion about buying for content. We don't care about the price if the product is unique and remarkable. We have a personal relation with the merchant who is selling his product.
What does this have to do with Facebook? You are right FB is like a big supermarket, tons of junk. Not to say Twitter doesn't have junk but I guess it's easier to control at 140 characters.
Both are tools, so depending on what your goal are, they need to be used independently not consolidated.
Merci for this post.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeJohn Falchettothanks, John. And isn't it just a better experience overall? The cake tastes better because of it!!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI completely agree that I have different networks on different sites. Facebook is much more personal for me and I only friend people that I've actually met or feel comfortable enough letting them in. Twitter is all out public for me and I like it that way.
And I completely agree that by trying to be everything to everyone, you always end up being nothing to no one. Big believer in this.
But I still see Facebook as a special case. This company/site/network/medium/phenomena/whatever you call it has become an integral part of the way we communicate. Like email. In fact, a lot of young people don't even use email. They use Facebook.
I always think back to almost a year ago. A friend of a family member (a friend I didn't really know at all) had some important information for me. To me, email (or the phone) is the way to communicate Def Con 1 information. For this person? It was Facebook. They messaged me on Facebook with extremely important information.
Of course, this person was in their very early 20s and Facebook is what they know. It's not just a social network to them. It's a communication medium, like the phone, email, or texting.
That's why I'm interested to see how Facebook's dipping into so much plays out. They're not just some website. They're a utility.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Liketimjahni do see that it has become a communication hub and I just don't get why the private message function in FB is better than email. it's an extra step. I get it in my email then have to click over to Fb to respond. Or are they just staying in FB and not even going to email? that must be it.
Regardless, I love it for a comm. hub, but not for shopping, checking in, and getting deals. Time will tell!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI'm very much a silo guy, trying to limit what gets shared where. I like Facebook. Its done wonders for me in building an on campus organization (groups is awesome). Is there a better tool for group communication? Probably. The trick for me would have been to get all of my members (30+ at this point) into that ap. They already check facebook though.
I don't buy into all the other services that facebook offers though. My places is foursquare, my deals are groupon, and my videos are youtube, and I'll keep it that way.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDevonJordan watch out lisagerber devon is dangerous.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHowieSPM DevonJordan Really? He seems pretty safe to me!! For groups, I agree. it's a great tool especially if everyone is already there. Why reinvent the wheel and make everyone work to setup somewhere else?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeNot a fan of Facebook at all. I am though very interested in your opinions about implications that it is trying to have on commence. I am a commercial real estate broker and it has been fun lately. My opinion: Facebook is gone within 5 years!. Your thoughts?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHi, dukelong when you ask about commerce, do you mean in terms of Facebook Deals or just via selling on FB? Have you been successful at making connections and selling on FB?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLisa Gerber dukelong
I know this is lame to do but....
http://www.dukelong.com/commercial-real-estate-sectors/commercial-real-estate-turn-facebook-off
http://www.dukelong.com/commercial-real-estate-sectors/commercial-real-estate-social-graph6-ways-we-kill-facebook
or in other words Facebook is worthless.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likedukelong that's not lame at all, thanks for sharing. I wasn't able to read it all but it seems we share the same opinion - no mixing of networks and one size fits all. I agree that commercial real estate would be a tough sell on FB. we're not on there for big purchases, but building relationships? yes. building trust and wanting to do business with you when we are ready for that multi-million dollar purchase? absolutely.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likedukelong Not five years. I bet less than three.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI agree 100%, They keep adding everything while now doing really nothing great. They think having all these member means greatness. They are not Number 1 in any segment. Photos? Nope. Events? Nope. Communication? Nope. Places? nope. Deals? Nope. Being average in everything doesn't mean greatness in aggregate.
Bill Green on Adverve Podcast this week says Facebook is like the Post Office. They bring you Purpose and Spam at the same time.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeHowieSPM I'm going to check out that podcast. Sounds interesting.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeLisa Gerber just so you know it is live and uncensored. But they are a hilarious duo. Angela Natividad luckthelady is whip smart and Bill Green is a razor wit!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI like SM silos; I have zero interest in knowing when a friend goes to a store or comments on a message, I'd simply like to know they're doing well and are happy.
"(...) when Facebook announced Places, I rolled my eyes. Facebook comments plugin was introduced a few weeks ago and now Facebook Deals is here. Facebook is becoming the Walmart of social media and it’s eroding the experience. I even wonder if it will become its downfall."
This comment nails it! I am aware it may become omnipresent at some point, and then become a lumbering and slow beast, full of junk. Be it through grass-roots organizing, or sending "They're so cute!" kitten photos via email, if FB chooses to become a commodity... it will eventually lead to a SM ghost town... who knows... we may just start (gasp!) dialing people on the phone, which wouldn't be such a bad thing, now would it?
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeI am with you, completely. GoBeyondIdeas and it already is full of junk in my opinion but we do have the ability to clean up who we follow and we can hide certain things as well.
Regarding the phone? you made me laugh out loud. I was trying to fit this NY Times article into my post in some way. mollimegasko brought it to my attention: Don't Call me and I Won't Call You: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/20/fashion/20Cultural.html
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
LikeDefinitely a silo - at least the way you have defined it here. And I'm VERY careful, almost paranoid, about what I put on line. No matter what silo.
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Likesaragoldberger good point, we DO have to be careful what we are saying! So many people lose their jobs from a thoughtless tweet or FB post. (honestly, I don't know how it passes their personal brain filter, but it does!!) I always think twice before hitting send. Thanks for the comment!
- spam
- offensive
- disagree
- off topic
Like