<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Faking it on Social Media: What are the Costs?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/</link>
	<description>Professional Development for PR and Marketing Pros</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 20 Jun 2013 12:07:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: ltcassociates</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/#comment-129315</link>
		<dc:creator>ltcassociates</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 03:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=13881#comment-129315</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For what it&#039;s worth, StatusPeople (the site referenced in this article), is what I would call &quot;Not Ready for Prime Time&quot;. It does not deliver consistent, accurate results, and considering the Salem Witch Trials which ensue from using its product, arguably should be tabled until they can produce a verifiable output.
 
I have notified the company repeatedly about specific issues (after several weeks, they informed me that their &quot;customer feedback form&quot; went straight into &quot;junk mail&quot;), before finally contacting them via Facebook. Although they are now aware of the problem, they have never remedied it, nor published any statement to their customers to my knowledge (even though presented proof that they were delivering inaccurate results).
 
The only solution they proposed was to offer me a one-month refund.
 
To the rest of you, I would not rely on the results you receive from a StatusPeople search. Sorry, wish I had better news to report. I love the concept, I really do. Maybe another company will spring up and duplicate the app, with better success.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For what it&#8217;s worth, StatusPeople (the site referenced in this article), is what I would call &#8220;Not Ready for Prime Time&#8221;. It does not deliver consistent, accurate results, and considering the Salem Witch Trials which ensue from using its product, arguably should be tabled until they can produce a verifiable output.<br />
 <br />
I have notified the company repeatedly about specific issues (after several weeks, they informed me that their &#8220;customer feedback form&#8221; went straight into &#8220;junk mail&#8221;), before finally contacting them via Facebook. Although they are now aware of the problem, they have never remedied it, nor published any statement to their customers to my knowledge (even though presented proof that they were delivering inaccurate results).<br />
 <br />
The only solution they proposed was to offer me a one-month refund.<br />
 <br />
To the rest of you, I would not rely on the results you receive from a StatusPeople search. Sorry, wish I had better news to report. I love the concept, I really do. Maybe another company will spring up and duplicate the app, with better success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Top 10 Guest Blog Posts of 2012 (July - Dec) by @belllindsay &#124; Spin Sucks</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/#comment-122660</link>
		<dc:creator>Top 10 Guest Blog Posts of 2012 (July - Dec) by @belllindsay &#124; Spin Sucks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2013 18:01:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=13881#comment-122660</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] September 18th post by Stacey Acevero explored an issue that really irks me. Fakes and cheaters. Faking it on Social Media: What are the Costs? illustrates how fakers are undermining social media’s credibility, and why building a network of [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] September 18th post by Stacey Acevero explored an issue that really irks me. Fakes and cheaters. Faking it on Social Media: What are the Costs? illustrates how fakers are undermining social media’s credibility, and why building a network of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Traditional Media&#8217;s Role in the Adoption and Survival of Social Media</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/#comment-117564</link>
		<dc:creator>Traditional Media&#8217;s Role in the Adoption and Survival of Social Media</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=13881#comment-117564</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Faking it on Social Media: What are the Costs? (spinsucks.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Faking it on Social Media: What are the Costs? (spinsucks.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Small Business and Social Media: You Have Goals, Don&#8217;t You?</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/#comment-116945</link>
		<dc:creator>Small Business and Social Media: You Have Goals, Don&#8217;t You?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2012 10:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=13881#comment-116945</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Faking it on Social Media: What are the Costs? (spinsucks.com) [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Faking it on Social Media: What are the Costs? (spinsucks.com) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tinu</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/#comment-116484</link>
		<dc:creator>Tinu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2012 22:27:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=13881#comment-116484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s absolutely true that fake followers are the top level of a cascading avalanche of failure.  If you have fake or inactive followers, they can&#039;t or won&#039;t respond to your content. That will throw your numbers off.  And I say that from years of testing what the RESULTS of these actions are rather than passing a morality-based judgement -- it just doesn&#039;t work to have more followers than the action on what you share can back up. But given than even the official Twitter account has 33% fake or inactive folllowers, it makes me wonder how scientific this method of measuring which followers are fake and which are simply inactive. Unlike MySpace where everyone was automatically Tom&#039;s friend, Twitter isn&#039;t set up so that you have to follow Twitter when you first use Twitter. You have to manually follow at least your first follower. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s absolutely true that fake followers are the top level of a cascading avalanche of failure.  If you have fake or inactive followers, they can&#8217;t or won&#8217;t respond to your content. That will throw your numbers off.  And I say that from years of testing what the RESULTS of these actions are rather than passing a morality-based judgement &#8212; it just doesn&#8217;t work to have more followers than the action on what you share can back up. But given than even the official Twitter account has 33% fake or inactive folllowers, it makes me wonder how scientific this method of measuring which followers are fake and which are simply inactive. Unlike MySpace where everyone was automatically Tom&#8217;s friend, Twitter isn&#8217;t set up so that you have to follow Twitter when you first use Twitter. You have to manually follow at least your first follower. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_Strong</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/#comment-116309</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 21:15:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=13881#comment-116309</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @ryancox  No worries brother. @sacevero ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @ryancox  No worries brother. @sacevero </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryancox</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/#comment-116300</link>
		<dc:creator>ryancox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2012 19:44:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=13881#comment-116300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @sacevero  @Frank_Strong It was a bad attempt at giving my friend Stacey a little grief. I thought my tone, albeit odd choice to some, was 100% clear I was joshing with a friend. I didn&#039;t mean to give anyone a thought that what I was saying wasn&#039;t just friends picking on friends. Stacey is total legit. Sorry for the confusion, it was (in hindsight) poor taste on my part.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @sacevero  @Frank_Strong It was a bad attempt at giving my friend Stacey a little grief. I thought my tone, albeit odd choice to some, was 100% clear I was joshing with a friend. I didn&#8217;t mean to give anyone a thought that what I was saying wasn&#8217;t just friends picking on friends. Stacey is total legit. Sorry for the confusion, it was (in hindsight) poor taste on my part.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sacevero</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/#comment-116052</link>
		<dc:creator>sacevero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=13881#comment-116052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @Frank_Strong  &lt;--- Best. Boss. Ever. @ryancox You&#039;re lucky you&#039;re an actual friend :p ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @Frank_Strong  &lt;&#8212; Best. Boss. Ever. @ryancox You&#8217;re lucky you&#8217;re an actual friend :p </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank_Strong</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/#comment-115992</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank_Strong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 01:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=13881#comment-115992</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @ryancox I see.  Could not discern that from the chatter here.  I can take hits; but one thing that makes horns grow out of my head is picking on my team.  It&#039;s a strength and a weakness. Besides, I was thinking to myself, how can anyone possibly want to pick on Ace?  @sacevero ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @ryancox I see.  Could not discern that from the chatter here.  I can take hits; but one thing that makes horns grow out of my head is picking on my team.  It&#8217;s a strength and a weakness. Besides, I was thinking to myself, how can anyone possibly want to pick on Ace?  @sacevero </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ryancox</title>
		<link>http://spinsucks.com/social-media/faking-it-on-social-media-what-are-the-costs/#comment-115990</link>
		<dc:creator>ryancox</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2012 00:50:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://spinsucks.com/?p=13881#comment-115990</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ @Frank_Strong  @sacevero Frank I was just giving a friend a hard time! lol No worries! (sorry for any confusion)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> @Frank_Strong  @sacevero Frank I was just giving a friend a hard time! lol No worries! (sorry for any confusion)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
