0
18
Facebook
0
105
Gini Dietrich

Six Verbs You Need to Understand for the New Web

By: Gini Dietrich | April 6, 2011 | 
52

Thanks to my friend John Pitocco, I ran into a pretty interesting article about the six verbs for the web, from senior Wired maverick Kevin Kelly.

He discussed these verbs during his opening keynote at the Web 2.0 conference, in which he believes are the prevailing forces shaping modern web culture.

They are: screening, interacting, sharing, flowing, accessing, and generating.

Come again? Can you make the connection between these six words and the interwebs? It’s not like they’re more popular words such as, say, Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, Quora, Foursquare, RSS, blogs, oh my! These are just normal words that could be used to describe almost anything.

But therein lies the magic. Allow me to explain.

  1. Screening. Twenty or so years ago, the prediction would be that the web would be like TV with a gazillion channels. But it turns out “they” were wrong. The “screens in our lives are taking the web everywhere, to the screen in Starbucks, smartphones, tablets, the living room, the workplace, etc.” He predicts that one screen could rule us all and whomever invents it was be really, really wealthy.
  2. Interacting. Remember when you saw the Minority Report and thought it was impossible that you’d ever be able to manipulate images on a computer like Tom Cruise did in that movie? Well, it’s here! Kind of. Kelly refers to the way we interact with content and how the web responds by adapting to our behavior. Now it’s possible for app developers to adapt their products and solutions to our emotions and our individual needs.
  3. Sharing. Everything that can be shared, will be shared and Kelly thinks we’re at the very infant stages of this movement as demonstrated by Twitter, Facebook, and Foursquare (ah ha! There are those words). This won’t come as a surprise to those of you who use the social web every day, but sharing is going to continue enhancing the value of whatever it is we do decide to share. Meaning, if I check into Starbucks every day and I become the Mayor (oh wait! I already am), the information I’m sharing, from what time I check in to what I buy, is sent to Starbucks and they begin to target me specifically when they have a sale on lattes. We’ll get even more savvy about what we share and how we share it in order to help the companies that we do business with to customize our experience.
  4. Flowing. I think Kelly uses flowing instead of streaming, which most of us are familiar with (he’s just trying to be fancy, I guess). “Streams are everywhere now, on all of those screens in the screening trend. We can watch movies, listen to music, play games, and participate in conversations by tapping into these streams on the web.”
  5. Accessing. We used to own everything. It still kills me that we bought a server (for A LOT of money) five years ago and it’s already obsolete. Now, as long as we can instantly access what we need, we don’t care if we own it. That goes for files, games, movies, books, etc. Kelly says, “If you can access your collection from anywhere by logging into the cloud, you won’t need to own it. All of the music on the planet can now fit on one six-terabyte hard disk drive in a computer you can buy for $585. But there is no reason to carry it around.”
  6. Generating. This last one is something we’re thinking a lot about as we get ready for the full launch of Spin Sucks Pro (aka Project Jack Bauer) in less than a month. Anything digital that can be copied, will be copied. We can’t prevent it. Sure, we can put in things to monitor how our information is being distributed, but we really can’t prevent people from copying illegally. So what you really need to is what we’re doing: Focus on giving users the opportunity to generate their own content so it’s personalized and customized. Paul Sutton asked me a few weeks ago where I thought content development and delivery was going and I told him we watch the music industry pretty closely. That industry has seen a complete wipe-out because of digital piracy, but musicians now can charge more for concerts, and have them more more often and in smaller venues, because that experience can’t be replicated or stolen as easily.

What do you think about these verbs? On which of these are you focusing your business efforts? Or do you have a focus not listed here?

About Gini Dietrich


Gini Dietrich is the founder and CEO of Arment Dietrich, a Chicago-based integrated marketing communications firm. She is the lead blogger here at Spin Sucks and is the founder of Spin Sucks Pro. She is the co-author of Marketing in the Round and co-host of Inside PR. Her second book, Spin Sucks, is due out in November 2013

48 comments
Ari Herzog
Ari Herzog

Kind of?

Your interacting bullet is already here through the use of touch screens and remote controls most evident by TV broadcasters.

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator

@Ari Herzog I think you mistake these as my verbs. They come from Wired co-founder, Kevin Kelly.

Ari Herzog
Ari Herzog

@ginidietrich No mistake. Understood they were his verbs. But your explanations of the verbs, and my above comment responded to that.

Wes Towers
Wes Towers

Hi, Gini. At last, I have landed on your site after months of seeing you over at Danny Brown's and even at Mitch Mitchell's. And, I am glad, because for the first read, I get six verbs that I am into, although in my slow but steady pace. As, Jeff before me said, I also do much listening as well because I won't be able to get the designs for my clients right if I don't. Great stuff, Gini. Will surely come back for more.

jeffespo
jeffespo

I would add listening to this list as it has evolved in the 2.0 arena as well.

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator like.author.displayName 1 Like

@jeffespo Yes! Awesome addition. Totally going to write a second post about this.

Howie Goldfarb
Howie Goldfarb

Great post Gini but I have a different view on sharing using your foursquare example for Starbucks. I think we are moving toward Consumer - Brand interaction vs Consumer sharing with Consumers. I will check in on FourSquare and Gowala but unlike when I first signed up I almost never post to twitter anymore. But if the places I check in know I checked in and were able to use that network to give me custom offers then that would be great. But I see this migrating off networks and going direct via the cell networks. If you forget to check in and go inside..ooops often too late no satellite service.

As for the Music Industry. I come from a B2B distribution background. The price of a $14 CD included $1 for the artist $4.50 for packaging! Blam. No more packaging. No more shipping! No more printing CDs! So revenues for that industry were actually bloated with dead weight. Look for dead weight. Paper is dead weight. Transporting paper. Logging. Paper mills. All dead weight that have zero inalienable rights to exist. So when a book publisher gets rid of the dead weight just like music revenues drop. Because you get down to the real value with is digital IP. Remember every input gets profit added on top when it comes to manufacturing.

You are lucky being digital to start with. Arment Dietrich is Videodrome!

nateriggs
nateriggs

Really thought provoking piece, Gini. I like Johnny's addition of "reporting" and I think that goes farther than just business. We can also now report on ourselves and our own patterns of using the internet. For instance, anyone use TweetStats? I'm not even sure if it's still functional, but it was a great way to report on how individual users behaved on Twitter. Just one example that came to my mind.

What's interesting is that the phrase "augmented reality" never appeared in this post, yet that's essentially one of the stories it tells. Seems like that buzz word faded with the close of 2009. Yet, the interwebz is already a part of our relaity. Hell, SXSWi (or any other internet or electronics conference for that matter) is a whole experience where the lines between the matrix and the real world get super fuzzy.

Has augmented reality as a buzz word disappeared because we are getting back a new definition of reality?

[P.S. I want a flying car that fits into a briefcase. Better yet? I want an iPad that turns into a flying car and then doubles as a briefcase...and makes my coffee. :) ]

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator

@nateriggs What about the laundry? I'd really like all of that AND for it do the laundry.

I think augmented reality is not a verb so he used interacting instead. But, I think you're right, it's definitely in there but perhaps it's just part of our experience now so we don't have to talk about it. Or maybe we just live in our web bubble and forget the real world has NO idea what we're talking about.

hannush
hannush

A very good list. But I think the web would be a better experience if we would added "organizing" and "focusing" to the list. For me, sometimes these first 6 lead to information overload and loss of purpose.

Lisa Gerber
Lisa Gerber like.author.displayName 1 Like

@hannush this is a really good point, and I think it comes down to tools and how you use them to keep your experience focused the way YOU want it. I've been doing a lot of research on social bookmarking and which is a great way to organize the online presence.

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Lisa Gerber @hannush I'm sorry. Did you say something? I just saw a pretty shiny new penny over there! LOOK!

I think I would add organizing and focusing under generating. Or, if you're not interested in creating content, then they can be stand alones. So yes, they belong for sure!

kansashealthorg
kansashealthorg

Gini, I think this is a great post that hits the target on actions that businesses can take to focus their efforts on the web.

As a nonprofit organization that just jumped into the social media pool a few months ago, we're heavily focused on interacting and sharing, because we believe that will help us find and build our online community, which is the first step in our strategy.

I also agree with thewhalehunters' comment about filtering. As a communicator/marketer at a small organization, I wear many hats, so I only have an hour or two a day to focus on our corporate social media efforts. Without filtering, there's no way I could be effective, so I highly value and follow people who help me separate the wheat from the chaff.

And I wonder if "helping" belongs on this list of verbs as well. I believe answering questions, directing others to great resources and even offering words of encouragement are very important ways to establish your presence and reputation online. Those who focus primarily on their own messages and their own brand and use social media as a megaphone easily get tuned out. But listening and helping others first (and often) gives your messages a better shot at being heard and responded to.

Thanks again for a really helpful post! @kamkansas@kansashealthorg

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator

@kansashealthorg You came to the blog! YAY!! I absolutely think helping belongs on the list. I blogged about that yesterday - social is just that; being social. What a great addition. I'm going to write a second blog post with these tips!

Lisa Gerber
Lisa Gerber like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

and remember the Jetsons? They predicted almost everything. when will our cars turn into mini airplanes?

I think sharing is a big one. From a consumer standpoint, I think about what I'm sharing every day and I am very careful - think twice before I do so. This could mean a lot of things - from providing information about myself, giving a credit card number, or even as simple as commenting on someone's blog, facebook post, or what I tweet. Therefore, as businesses, we need to be prepared for this, earn trust, keep trust, and be ready to deal with breaches in that trust.

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator

@Lisa Gerber I think the flying cars are coming! I saw a prototype somewhere (can't remember where). It's so true about earning trust and keeping it. I think the point we all need to remember, as business leaders, is that we can (and should) use the information our customers are giving us to build better products and services, but we should never share it with anyone not working inside our four walls (figuratively speaking).

Mark_Harai
Mark_Harai like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Lisa Gerber very sage contribution here Lisa. If you're a professional participating on the social web, I agree - you must be thoughtful about what you're putting out there. It will follow you for the rest of your digital and professional life.

Lisa Gerber
Lisa Gerber like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Mark_Harai Thank you!! My litmus test: I compare it to running for the presidency. Would I want someone to dig this out and show the world if I were a candidate?

Mark_Harai
Mark_Harai

@Lisa Gerber That's setting the bar high, right where it needs to be for a PR professional like yourself ; )

JohnnyRusso
JohnnyRusso

Great list. I would add a 7th....reporting. To know if somehting is working or failing, we test and report.

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator

@JohnnyRusso Tell me more! Who do you report to and what is reported?

JohnnyRusso
JohnnyRusso

@ginidietrich

Our current effort in reporting is primarily to improve the user's overall experience on our site. Through on-site surveys, A/B and multivariate testing, and other feedback, we can tell what pieces of content or which features are most popular on both our corporate and community sites. It’s important for us to know, because we are defining a new term in our industry, and we have to know what resonates, what is confusing, and what should be tossed.

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator

@JohnnyRusso This is awesome! Thanks for the additional detail. You may see yourself quoted soon.

thewhalehunters
thewhalehunters

. What you do so well in this post is interpret what the verbs mean in a business development sense. "Sharing" for example. It didn't start out as a business word; it's a mealy-mouthed kumbaya word. Until Starbucks and others figured out how to monetize it. It's the "how does this relate to earning money" that the retailers are learning but a lot of B2Bs haven't figured out yet. Like you Gini, I'm really interested in "generating." "Protecting" [another verb :-)] is becoming obsolete regarding intellectual property, especially in a global business society. Your idea to allow users to customize and personalize is one solution. Another solution is to collaborate with your customers and others to create a continual stream of new content--anything pirated is simply out-of-date.

A verb that Kelly missed (unless you misinterpreted what he meant by "screening") is "filtering." Because so much info is out there, I am attracted to the people who clear it out and zero in on the good & relevant, saving me time and energy.

Great post.

Danny Brown
Danny Brown like.author.displayName 1 Like

I'd disagree with #1. Unless I'm reading his theory wrong (or your overview - ha!), "they" are not wrong - the web *is* a gazillion channels; we just have more places to watch these channels, but that doesn't deflect the ever-growing number.

And I really doubt there'll ever be a Lord of the Rings-type screen to watch them all on; Apple and Google won't allow it. ;-)

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator like.author.displayName like.author.displayName 2 Like

@Danny Brown I'm sure it's my overview you disagree with...YOU BRAT! I think his point was more that we thought the web would be more like cable TV, but that you'd have to be home or at your desk to "watch" it. But now we have screens on our desks, in our pockets, in our bags, in our thumbs (OK, maybe that's just you and it explains how you do so much) and that eventually we'll require it just be one screen. Who knows? I'll ask the Magic 8 ball at Starbucks tomorrow and see what it says.

Danny Brown
Danny Brown

@ginidietrich Me, disagree with you? Perish the thought, miss! :)

There's a new report out (which forms the basis of a post this week) on internet use. And we're still tied to these desktops (cable TV's), despite smartphones and mobile browsing taking off.

I guess I'm just not sold on the one screen thing, and that we're not still hooked into gazillions of channels.

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator

@Danny Brown I agree with you there. I love the idea of just using my iPad for everything, but it's not there yet. I guess the point is that this won't happen tomorrow...but in the future.

Mark_Harai
Mark_Harai like.author.displayName 1 Like

@ginidietrich @Danny Brown You believe in that stuff Gini? I never would have guessed that - LOL!

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator like.author.displayName 1 Like

@Mark_Harai Are you kidding?! The Magic 8 ball knows all! For instance, when I get to Starbucks, I ask it if I get a free drink that day. Sometimes it says yes (today) and sometimes it says no (the rest of the week). It's great!

bryanwillmert
bryanwillmert

I would tend to agree with these verbs, especially in what is to come in the activity taking place online. We see products shaping towards reality of what was once fantasy, aka Minority Report! Recently, I sat with a few venture capitalist and they said a similar thing just in other words than these 6 verbs. They simply put it that if your company/product does not include mobility, social, and gaming (aka interactive competition) then they will not even consider you as potential platform to invest their money.

I see many places that I am mixed with that are in a place of just getting themselves off the ground so our biggest efforts right now are in generating and sharing. For many it is just a matter of catching up, while others are moving down the field further and faster, but with the right steps they can get caught back up into where they need to be before they are left in the dust dying.

Great post Gini.. but I guess I say that about most of them! haha

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator

@bryanwillmert It's funny you say this. A friend of mine posted on Facebook last night that she's tired of trying to keep up with all the technology changes. I think we'll likely hit a point of exhaustion (which is part of the reason we're launching Spin Sucks Pro now) and people will be looking to others to stay ahead and just teach them.

KenMueller
KenMueller like.author.displayName 1 Like

I like this. It certainly makes me think about what I do a bit differently, but where the real power lies is not in those 6 verbs individually, but collectively. There is a lot of overlap and the power of each one is somewhat contingent on all of the others. The three that I seem to focus most on are interacting, sharing, and generating, which I guess seems natural because like many others in my field I talk a lot about "engaging".

The real challenge will be keep these verbs active and alive, and not just give them lip-service. Our industry is filled with buzz words: engage, transparency, authenticity, conversation...and many of them lose their meaning because we use them so much. And sadly, many who use them, don't really practice them in their truest form. They are great for selling books, but do we live them?

ginidietrich
ginidietrich moderator like.author.displayName 1 Like

@KenMueller LOL! Before I clicked to see who had commented, I thought, "Let it be Ken! Let it be Ken!" Your streak is alive!

It's funny you talk about transparency and authenticity as the big buzz words that no one lives. We just had this conversation internally because we were approached by someone who wanted to guest blog for us, but wanted to do it anonymously. My counsel to the team was that if we're going to live the transparency talk we give, we can't allow anonymity.

KenMueller
KenMueller like.author.displayName 1 Like

@ginidietrich If I had a nickle for every time someone said "Let it be Ken..." But it's only me because of timing. You happen to post your blogs right at the time when I sit down with my first cup of coffee (after walking the dog) and start my morning routine.

And I agree with you on anonymity. That's one that really bothers me. I often won't permit people to comment on my site if they try to do so anonymously (or under some weird name like "Sugarbutt95"). This is blogging and social media, not a chatroom! If you have something to say, either stand behind what you say or don't say it at all.