The Power of Social Over Search Engines
Today’s guest post is written by Paul Sutton. 
How long do you think you could go without using an Internet search engine?
I asked my friends and networks the question, and two thirds of the people I asked said that, on average, they use a search engine more than 10 times per day. They don’t think about it, they just do it. And they have total faith in the results they receive. Think about the power and influence this gives search engines over the way we see the world.
I wanted to find out just how vital search engines have become to our everyday lives, so I decided to give up Yahoo! and Bing for two entire months.
I quit Google cold turkey.
For the past few weeks I’ve been relying on my friends and online community in place of searching the web. Little did I know when I started the experiment at the beginning of June that halfway through it Google would throw in a curve ball in the form of Google+. If anything, the #NoSearch project (yes, I coined ‘project’ before Google did!) has given me a different perspective on what’s coming out of Mountain View. And despite what you may read from the more cynical among us *cough* Gini Dietrich *cough*, I believe Google+ could, given time, reshape the way we use the web.
The whole point of #NoSearch is to investigate collective intelligence and the power of social networks.
When you don’t use search engines, your online community becomes vital both for work and pleasure. And at its core, Google+ is intent on helping you to create a very personalized network, segmented by your contacts’ interests, your relationship with them, and what you want them to see (and not to see). Neither Facebook nor Twitter can lay claim to the same ethos, focused as they are on sharing everything with everyone. What Google+ will do is to enable you to truly build a community around yourself, with different contacts and friends from different areas of your life all in one place. If it gains traction – and who’s to say that with search, Chrome, Gmail, and Android behind it that it won’t – it could be very powerful stuff.
If #NoSearch is teaching me one thing, it’s that those using social media effectively truly thrive on their ability to harness collective intelligence and community.
From a business perspective, community is becoming more vital by the day. Social media platforms such as Facebook and Google+ are built around effectively managing huge amounts of real-time data generated by users on computers and mobile devices. If, as a marketer, you can come to grips with that and leverage it, you have a great competitive advantage.
The #NoSearch project may only be an experiment (let’s face it, who’s stupid enough to forgo search engines on an ongoing basis?!), but it is proving to me that the wisdom of the crowd is more often than not far superior to the results you can get from a search engine. Google may have speed, but people have knowledge. And if Google can integrate Google+ with search, we’re on the verge of a new era in the lifecycle of the web based around personalised communities.
What do you think?
You can follow the #NoSearch project on Posterous, Twitter and Audioboo. Paul Sutton is Head of Social Communications at BOTTLE, where he is responsible for devising creative social media strategies to meet commercial client objectives. He blogs at www.thesocialweb.co.uk.
Very different take on things Paul. I am not that bullish on social search replacing the traditional search engines. But if I could combine them properly that would be great. And being a resident hater of the Facebook Management, Business Model, and Business Ethics it would be interesting what it would mean for google and for tech/media. It could make Google the most valuable company in the world to be honest if they could get 500mil users world wide. Could be bad for tech/media/Telecomm what if Google had you as a customer for maps, mobile data (android op system), voice/talk, search, email, browser, docs, social.
That said would be nice if maybe Diaspora gets released and gives Google competition.
HowieSPM I'd totally agree that social search won't 'replace' traditional search, but Google holds the power to search: it's not that far removed from a kind of cult in the way it controls us. I know that's a big claim - I'll write more about it on the blog soon - but it's an insight that's come from this #NoSearch project.
Re: Diaspora, they've surely missed the boat now. A year ago they can all the goodwill and buzz in the world, but in the last 12 months Facebook and Twitter have become larger and more powerful and now Google's jumped them too. I doubt that it'll ever see the light of day, to be honest...
Google has created a buzz around with +1 introductions and if +1 works, it will not only improve search quality, but also make ads more engaging. This may potentially improve Google’s ads, and eventually may turn into a core social product that can expand in new directions.
OnlineBusinesVA The impact on search is something that, in my opinion, has been overlooked with all of the talk around G+. Google has made one hell of a smart move and although the focus is on 'will it kill Facebook' (no, of course not!) we should really be focusing on what it'll do for core Google services. Social has been the missing link in Google's arsenal for a while now, but search may (MAY) not be the same again.
Great article! In my opinion though, this falls into more of a Utopian view of the future. As I'm pretty sure Google intends to merge Google and Google+ services (most likely in an over-ambitious time frame), I feel like relying too heavily on the collective intelligence is going to open up even more opportunity to skew results. Don't get me wrong, companies are manipulating results already, whether using blackhat strategies that slip through the cracks, or even innocent techniques that somehow just work. But, I feel like all the +1ing is going to open up a whole new world of fraudulent bumping of content. Then again, I may just be too pessimistic.
rjfrasca You may be right, and there's no doubt that G+ will be gamed in the same way that every other social network out there is gamed (foursquare anyone?!). But I'm not suggesting for a moment that search is dying, merely that it's changing. One of my many learnings from doing this, which I'll outline over the next few weeks on the blog, is that Google Instant is one hell of a powerful instrument. To the point I've had to turn it off when typing URLs into my browser because with it turned on I was effectively searching without even realising it!
I also don't mean to suggest that life without search engines is a reality. This is merely an experiment and not something I'll be sticking with come the end of July. The intention was really to explore the nature of social media and search, and to see what insights it gave me that I can then pass on and apply in my work and personal lives. As I say, I'll be talking about those on the blog in a week or two.
Thanks for the input. Appreciate it!








[...] The Power of Social Over Search Engines (spinsucks.com) [...]