Subscribe

Stay Smart With Spin Sucks

Join 100,000+ marketers and communicators who stay abreast of an ever-evolving PESO Model.

By subscribing you agree with our Privacy Policy.

Get in touch

support@spinsucks.com
P.O. Box 13013,
Chicago, IL

Five Things You Can Learn from the Under Armour Olympics CrisisBy Gini Dietrich

During this year’s Winter Olympics, Under Armour came under some serious fire.

The high-end sports clothing retailer designed a new uniform – a high-tech skinsuit called Mach 39 – for the speed skating team with the goal of breaking into international markets with the highly visible and global games.

When the team didn’t manage to get any medals, they blamed the uniforms for poor performance.

While it seems pretty ludicrous to blame a uniform for the team’s worst showing in 30 years…or maybe ever, the Under Armour engineers quickly made a switch and got the speed skaters into different uniforms.

When they continued to perform poorly, it became pretty evident it was not the fault of Under Armour or their new skinsuits.

But not before the retailer had a crisis on their hands.

A week had gone by – an eternity in today’s digital world – and the court of public opinion had heard only the uniforms were to blame.

Five Things Under Armour Did Brilliantly Well

Under Armour had two choices: Blame the U.S. team to save its reputation (which could paint them as a bunch of losers and create distaste with the American public) or go into full-on crisis communications mode.

They chose the second, and quite brilliantly managed their way out of something that could have been detrimental not only to the new product, but also to the entire organization.

Here is what you can learn from the retailer if you’re ever faced with a crisis of your own.

While the stock fell 2.38 percent in the first week following the blame the Mach 39 received, the company rebounded on Wall Street and in the minds of the American public.

They continue to show their support of the team and will for many years to come.