Skip to Main Content

Subscribe

Stay Smart With Spin Sucks

Join 100,000+ marketers and communicators who stay abreast of an ever-evolving PESO Model.

By subscribing you agree with our Privacy Policy.

Get in touch

support@spinsucks.com
P.O. Box 13013,
Chicago, IL

placeholder

PR Flaks


Uncategorized | October 3, 2006

Last week Anna Griffin (not to be confused by the paper company of the same name) at the Oregonian wrote a story about public relations “flaks” placing stories.  She called out the Metropolitan Group, which has offices in Portland, Chicago, and Washington D.C., because they claim on their Web site they placed a story in USA Today.  

Where do we, as PR professionals, draw the line?  It’s industry jargon to say we placed a story, if we worked with a reporter, helped schedule interviews, provided background and research, and answered questions.

It’s our job, as PR professionals, to be as helpful as possible to reporters, provide them with real news, and be respectful of their deadlines and editorial ethics.

Does that mean Anna Griffin has never worked with a PR professional?  Or that she just doesn’t like the word “placed”?  Is this considered spin?  If so, does it suck?

Related Posts

We’re biased, but we think this is the most practical and insightful marketing, communications, and entrepreneurship blog anywhere!

Ready to Learn More?

Reach out. We’re here to help. Email us at support@spinsucks.com.