Laura Petrolino

Ad Blocking, Brand Journalism, and the Publisher’s Dilemma

By: Laura Petrolino | February 1, 2016 | 

Ad Blocking, Brand Journalism, and The Publisher's DilemmaBy Laura Petrolino

I actually started out to write a very personal “life lessons” post about birthdays (because Lubna Sadik asked for a birthday analogy post and I have to encourage her so she continues to encourage me). But as I went to check out an article on Forbes pertaining to my post, I was stopped.

Not just with the usual, annoying Forbes quote landing page, but totally stopped, with this:

Ad Blocking, Brand Journalism, and The Publisher's Dilemma

The Stats Around Ad Blocking

That led me to think about ad blocking and investigate how big of a problem it might be (obviously big for Forbes—who can charge advertisers large amounts—to gate their content in an attempt to protect their advertising dollars).

I found a 2015 report from PageFair, which outlined some stats that probably make the advertising and publishing world a bit queasy:

  • Ad blocking was estimated to cost publishers nearly $22 billion during 2015.
  • There are 198 million active ad block users around the world.
  • Ad blocking grew by 41 percent globally in the 12 months prior to the report.
  • Specifically, U.S. ad blocking grew by 48 percent to reach 45 million active users (as of June 2015).

Likewise, a study by Sourcepoint and comScore showed ad blocking is most popular among younger audiences and high earners—so the audiences advertisers are most likely to want to reach (and those publishers can charge the most to help them reach).

And while these studies focused on desktop ad blocking, mobile is also on the rise.

So what’s a publisher to do?

  • People don’t want to pay for content (the 2015 Reuters Institute Digital News Report found around 11 percent of people pay for digital content).
  • And they don’t want ads that pay for the content.
  • Content likes, shares, comments, and admiration don’t necessarily put food on the table for publishers or their staff.

The Results of Forbes Ad-Blocking Experiment

Forbes launched their content blocking experiment December 17th, and after a month in action Lewis Vorkin, chief product officer, wrote a fascinating recap of the results, to date.

  • Forty-four percent of their test pool—1.6 million visitors— turned off ad blockers or white listed Forbes content and ads.
  • The number of viewable ads on pages consumed by those who turned off their blockers is 9.3 percent more than the sitewide average for those who never used blockers.
  • The time spent on page, by those who turned off their blockers was twice the amount of non-ad block users—three minutes.
  • The clickthrough rate on ads by those turning off ad blockers remained above the industry average.
  • Forbes delivered 29 million new ad impressions between December 17 and January 14.

Why We Block Ads

Lewis also curated the feedback they had received since the start to the test into a seven point checklist of why people use ad blockers:

  1. Ad Clutter: Flashing, jumping, in-your-face ads, video pre-rolls, and other ad techniques used to disturb the user experience.
  2. Ad Networks: They frequently stalk users across the web, and often carry malicious software.
  3. Privacy and Security: As Lewis points out, “There are many unscrupulous players out there who try to work the seams of ad networks.” Add in cookies and other trackers that collect our information and know the name of our first born child (before we have it) and it’s pretty scary.
  4. Bandwidth: Many ads slow down load speed or lock-up bandwidth so much they make web surfing or even scrolling down the page impossible, again destroying the user experience.
  5. Generational: As many other studies have shown, the new consumer was born and raised on free content. They expect it and demand it.
  6. Transparency: People want to control their own privacy, so not knowing what information is collected on them as they surf the web is troubling.
  7. Content Trends: TL;DR trends encourage content that’s short and concise. But when you take a 500 word story and jam it with the same number of ads as a 1,500 word story….it doesn’t translate well.

What the Future Holds

When you look at the majority of above points they can be summarized in user experience and privacy.

Now the privacy issue is a completely different beast altogether, but we see the quest to improve user experience played out in the smart and strategic use of brand journalism, native advertising, and sponsored content.

I remember Gini Dietrich first talking about the rise of native advertising in 2013 and wondering how it would play out.

Since then we’ve seen an increasing amount of examples of this tactic used really well to blur the lines between content marketing and advertising, and it’s something we look at often when building out the paid media side of client strategies because the many creative and extremely targeted ways in can play out.

Forbes uses native advertising in their BrandVoice program, other major publishing outlets also integrate it exceptionally well into an overall branded newsroom—which uses the PESO model for creation and distribution—and includes both organic and sponsored content.

The secret is all the content provides value to the reader—even if the advertiser beyond the post itself isn’t of interest or value. This creates a completely different dynamic and removes problems with advertising destroying user experience—if it is done well.

It is trends like these that publishers and advertisers must look to as they move forward.

Content-based, creative, informative, useful—while not as easy as throwing up an ad page, the ever-evolving, demanding, and digitally savvy consumer is forcing marketers to create integrated and high quality campaigns to remain relevant and successful.

About Laura Petrolino

Laura Petrolino is the chief client officer at Arment Dietrich, an integrated marketing communications firm. She also is a weekly contributor to the award-winning PR blog, Spin Sucks. Join the Spin Sucks   community.

  • Great post. The stats and insights are really interesting. And wow! So you were totally serious about a birthday analogy post. So, I hope it’s still on its way. Maybe in time for Gini’s bday ( you encouraging me to keep encouraging you- will make for a perfect day gift for her :))

    • Hmmm….I swear I responded to this yesterday…but it disappeared! And yes….I must continue the vicious cycle of encouragement!!!

  • Interesting statistics. Thanks for sharing them.

    • I really found Lewis’ insight fascinating. It was nice to see the thought process behind the decision

  • It could be that the majority of the Forbes audience are sheep and will lap up any old crud, but I digress… 🙂

    The rise of ad blocking is something that’s been interesting to watch here in Canada, and see how media companies are getting by it. Of course, a lot of it is down to these same media agencies, because they’re creating such crappy and poorly targeted ads (if they’re targeting at all).

    I don’t mind ads per se, but only if they make sense. If they take a NASCAR approach (“throw everything at them!”) then yes, I’ll use ad blockers and script blockers to nix that “experience”.

    Forbes needs to do a better job of managing its contributors and their lack of disclosure around paid content. Because that’s an ad by any other name, but now the poor audience doesn’t realize it and are getting sucker punched.

    Fun times!

    • Hahaha! First (as I’m sure will come as no surprise), please know my ad blocker is still firmly in place. Forbes is not Shakespearean prose, I can find the same content elsewhere.

      And I agree, actually I sort of enjoy really well done creative ads, because I like watching the art of it. And we have such an amazing ability to create great, well targeted ads now. There is no excuse for sludge. But that ad industry will always face the same thing the PR industry does (in examples such as “spray and pray” pitching), some people will really work on pushing the craft forward and pride themselves in innovative content which actually provides value, and some will just be deadbeats who clock in.

      Anyway, it will be a fascinating and ever evolving situation to watch.

  • Karl

    Great read Laura. For someone who spends way too much time on my mobile device, the most annoying this is the load speeds for pages with so many ads. Especially when I accidentally tap on it because the page hasn’t finished loading. I’m someone who has content blocking and ad blocking turned on just because it’s just a smoother experience.

    It will be interesting how marketers adjust via native advertising or being diligent with their ads.

    I actually wrote a piece on how marketers can avoid all this by just building their audience instead:

    Great post again.

    • Great Karl, I’ll check it out. And yes, agreed. Ads on mobile are infuriating! Normally causing me to just abandon the content.

  • howiegoldfarb

    I have been using Ad Blocker on Firefox since it was launched many years ago. It used to block:

    Ad Words and Suggested Results
    All Facebook Ads
    All Digital Ads
    Gmail and Email Ads

    IT WAS AWESOME! But now it does not block all those ads. Sadly.

    I have ZERO pity for the media industry. Until the Web we all had to pay to read content. Content that was already ad supported. The only people who benefited from online were the Ad Industry itself vs the publishers. Shame on them for being so dumb.

    But today this is changing. LA Times. WaPost. NY Times. Economist. Atlantic. and many more now have paywalls. In fact the Economist has been growing big time under this model.

    As for Forbes. What is a Forbe and why would you read a Forbe? I have a Forbe blocker on my browser. Best thing next to Ad Block Plus!

  • howiegoldfarb

    I wanted to add…..Brand Journalism is fine. But Native Ads I am not too happy with. The Paid Influence Bloggers like Shelly Kramer and Daniel Newman are native ads. Every sponsored post is a native ad. Slimy tactic to me.

    If you are going to sponsor content do it above board and pay for advertising alongside the content or openly pay a spokesperson. Everyone knows Peyton Manning does not eat Papa Johns. Everyone was not shocked Tiger Woods took off in a cadillac and that he doesn’t drive a buick. When people feel they were suckered they will hold a grudge forever.

  • Pompous self-important buttwads…